Washington  |  Alexandria VA  |  Boston  |  San Francisco  |  Seattle  |  London  |  Brussels


Comcast’s Web of Influence Touches Many Corners of Washington

The Washington Post, February 28, 2014

By By Holly Yeager

February 28, 2014

As Comcast pushes for approval of a $45 billion merger that would cement its dominance of the cable industry, the company stands to benefit from ties across Washington that it has built through contributions to think tanks, civil rights groups, and other organizations.

Comcast’s prolific charitable spending, together with top-level political connections, a roster of executives who have held key jobs in government, and one of the biggest lobbying operations in the city, have helped establish its status as one of the most influential companies in Washington.

The company’s reach across the capital also illustrates the many tools beyond traditional lobbying that corporations have at their disposal as they seek to influence policymakers.

“They’ve spread a lot of money around town to a lot of places, just for moments like this,” said Craig Aaron, president of Free Press, a consumer advocacy group that opposes the Time Warner Cable merger. At a minimum, Comcast could encourage the deal’s critics to sit out the debate, he said. “At best, they’ve got a whole network of people advocating for them.”

The Comcast Foundation gave out just over $16 million in grants in 2012, the most recent year for which tax documents are available.

“It’s an important corporate responsibility to participate in making the communities where we do business healthy and vibrant,” said David Cohen, the company’s government relations chief. Comcast officials said most of the foundation’s giving has little to do with Washington but reflects a long-term commitment to civil rights, education and leadership development.

That kind of corporate largesse proved useful the last time Comcast was trying to win regulatory approval for a major transaction.

As the Federal Communications Commission was weighing Comcast’s takeover of NBC Universal in 2010, members of Congress asked about its outreach to minorities. In a response submitted to the agency, attorneys for Comcast said the company and its foundation had given more than $1.8 billion in cash and in-kind support to community organizations over the previous nine years. And, they said, more than 200 of Comcast’s “community partners” had filed letters supporting the takeover, with most citing Comcast’s support of the communities it serves.

Many of the foundation’s grants are to small, local groups in the 39 states where Comcast does business. But others have a resonance in Washington. In 2012, for instance, it gave $385,000 to the National Council of La Raza, a major Hispanic civil rights group; $250,000 to the National Urban League; $50,000 to the Ford’s Theatre Society (the fourth installment of a five-year, $250,000 grant); and $5,000 to the Securities and Exchange Commission Historical Society.

The pending deal, announced Feb. 13, will be reviewed by the FCC and by antitrust officials at either the Justice Department or the Federal Trade Commission, and Comcast said it expects to win approval in nine to 12 months. The combined company would have 33 million cable subscribers and nearly as many broadband users, as well as content produced by NBC Universal, prompting worries that it will have huge power in determining what programs reach consumers.

Weeks before the deal was announced, billboards were plastered across Washington area Metro stations, drawing attention to Comcast’s efforts to bridge the digital divide by providing Internet access to low-income communities. And since November, the company has been sponsoring programming on the city’s main public radio station, WAMU (88.5 FM).

Contributions to think tanks are also part of the Washington strategy. They are intended to ensure that Comcast is “involved in the public policy discussions that affect the company,” said Sena Fitzmaurice, a spokesperson for the cable giant.

“Shoe leather lobbying gets you only so far,” said Michael Meehan, president of Squared Communications, who helps companies manage their Washington messages. “Then it’s think tanks that write white papers, and white papers are taken by shoe-leather lobbyists into the congressional offices.”

Comcast “has worked with most of the major think tanks in town who are interested in communications issues,” including the Aspen Institute, the Brookings Institution and the American Enterprise Institute, Fitzmaurice said, declining to provide further details.

Comcast, its affiliates and employees have also been active political donors to both parties, giving $6.5 million in the 2012 election cycle, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Read full article: The Washington Post, February 28, 2014